homenewsAboutLegislationHelp I'm StrandedMediaContactJoin UsSpacer
Sign the Petition

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Response to DOT Docket: Airlines request extension of 3 hour rule

BEFORE THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WASHINGTON, D.C.

--------------------------------------------------
In the matter of: :
:
Final Rule : Docket No. DOT-OST-2007-0022 :
Enhancing Airline Passenger :
Protections :
:
--------------------------------------------------

COMMENTS OF FLYERSRIGHTS.ORG
ON REQUESTS OF VARIOUS AIRLINES
FOR TEMPORARY EXEMPTIONS FROM 14 C.F.R. § 259.4
AT JOHN F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

FlyersRights.org, representing the interests of airline passengers, has reviewed the requests of JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) and Delta Air Lines, Inc., (“Delta”) for the Secretary of Transportation to grant temporary exemptions from the application of that provision in DOT’s newly-promulgated regulation, Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections, that will require U.S. airlines serving John F. Kennedy International Airport (“JFK”) to comply and adhere to a contingency plan pursuant to which the requesting airlines will not permit an aircraft to remain on the tarmac for more than three hours or, in the case of international flights, for a determined period of time. 14 C.F.R. §§ 259.4(b)(1) and (b)(2).

The airlines request this exemption from April 29, 2010, when the new regulation becomes effective, until November 2010, the estimated period of time during which Runway 13R-31L (“Bay Runway”) at JFK will continue to be closed for reconstruction.

FlyersRights.org strongly opposes DOT’s granting any exemption from this regulation to these or to any other airlines serving JFK.

In brief, the airlines are asking the Secretary of Transportation, who has statutory authority to protect airline passengers, to give those airlines Federal permission to keep their passengers stranded for more than three hours on taxiways at JFK because airlines have arrogantly overscheduled operations beyond the capacity of the JFK runway system during this temporary period. This overscheduling is possible because the FAA Administrator, who reports to the DOT Secretary, has failed to require the airlines serving JFK to reduce their scheduled operations there to avoid multi-hour departure delays before takeoff during the Bay Runway reconstruction period.

-- These Requests for Exemptions Must be Summarily Denied

The DOT Secretary should deny these airline requests out of hand and direct FAA Administrator Babbitt to meet promptly with the airlines and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, JFK’s operator, to require the airlines to realistically schedule airline operations correlated to available JFK runway capacity during this construction period.

-- FAA Has Failed to Manage “Flow Control” Over Unreasonably Long Taxiway Queuing

Airline passengers should not have to endure multi-hour delays on JFK’s taxiways because the FAA refuses to manage “flow control” over the ground movements of aircraft scheduled for departure. FlyersRights.org has recommended for years that FAA’s air traffic controllers at congested airports like JFK should be required to prohibit airlines from pushing their aircraft back from the gate when an unreasonably long taxiway delay before takeoff is inevitable. FAA has resisted, not wanting to preclude the airlines from using those taxiways as passenger parking lots.

-- The Airlines Have Had Many Months to Plan for the Reconstruction of the Bay Runway

The exemption-requesting airlines have long known about the approaching need for the Bay Runway to be closed temporarily for reconstruction. They have had many months to develop alternative solutions that wouldn’t make passengers suffer long tarmac delays: e.g., scheduling larger capacity aircraft, and adjusting departure schedules. Instead, they now propose distorting a new DOT regulation that was designed to protect airline passengers during occasional “irregular operations” (such as weather) to insulate themselves from the consequences of their chronic, everyday overscheduling of flights.

-- DOT’s Granting These Requested Exemptions Would Set a Bad Precedent

Worse, DOT’s granting the requested exemptions during JFK’s runway reconstruction would set a bad precedent. When other airports need to reconstruct their runways, the airlines won’t need to adjust or reduce their schedules to reflect the airport’s temporarily constrained runway capacity; they’ll just petition DOT to switch the burden to airline passengers to be exposed to uncontrolled tarmac delay time.

Respectfully submitted,


Kate Hanni, Executive Director
FlyersRights.org
159 Silverado Springs Drive
Napa, CA 94558

March 12, 2010

cc: J. Randall Babbitt
FAA Administrator

Susan M. Baer
Director of Aviation
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

7 comments:

MASimons said...

Agreed to NO extension of 3hr rule.
If airlines start cancelling flights with no apparant cause, passengers will vote with their wallets.
System will fix itself once airlines hurt even more.

James said...

Pick your poison. Sit in a plane longer then actually get to where you want to go or have them cancel the flight all together and not go. Sure passengers should be treated well, they are the customer but this site sounds like just a bunch of whining.

skytel said...

No Extention- I am tired of sitting on airplanes. They get 60 minutes thats it! Then it's either off the ground or off the airplane.
Anyone who steps in front of me is going with me, just like an end around sweep. Emergency doors WILL open and passengers WILL scatter around the tarmac and out onto the actives. I have a list of airlines that I will never fly on again because their is no upper level management in place. 60 minutes !

Justin G. said...

I think you are all truly overreacting. The fact of the matter that runway construction at JFK has to occur in order to accomodate the larger and heavier aircraft that are entering service. While I have been based out of JFK for many years, and have seen my fair share of delays, it would irritate me more as a passenger to wait for 3 hours, be #2 for departure, and then because of this rule, the construction project, and most likely bad weather, we had to get OUT of line to satisfy a bunch of whiney idiots. You people say that airlines should reduce their schedules, and yet, the majority of carriers at JFK have reduced by 10%. If they reduce it any more, the airlines risk losing money, and since it is a supply and demand industry, you all will be complaining that airfares are too high. If it really is that big of an issue, there are 3 airports in the NYC metro area...go to one of the other ones.

avgguy said...

Absolutely no to an extension of the 3 hr rule! I am tired of being treated like a piece of meat. I am also tired of the airlines acting like a bunch of petulant, whining children.

Chris said...

The only thing this new rule will do is cancel many flights so no fines will be made. DUH!!!! More people pissed off cause their flight is cancelled, and not even realizing its their own fault for this new reg.
As a pilot, I hate sitting around just as much as anyone else. This new reg will just make things worse in the end.

Christina said...

@MAsimons, you are so mistaken dear. I feel sorry for those of you that think "your wallets" can control the weather and the airports and think that the airlines have anything to do with it. I work on those planes and I damn sure don't want to sit there with imbeciles like you for any more time than I have to.

@skytel: You are just a ignorant fool and I'd like to see you try it on one of my flights.You would be in jail so fast. Use your upper brain before your mouth opens and try not to sound as if you may have some common sense.